In what scenario might an officer not be entitled to immunity concerning wiretap violations?

An officer might not be entitled to immunity concerning wiretap violations if the violation is deemed unlawful. Immunity for law enforcement typically protects officers when they act within the bounds of the law or when they are following legal procedures. However, if their conduct is found to have violated statutory requirements or constitutional protections related to wiretapping, this unlawful action can result in liability and negate immunity. This means that acting outside of legal guidelines or without proper authority can expose an officer to legal consequences.

While operating under consent, being authorized by a judge, or acting in good faith can typically provide protections or justifications for an officer's actions, these scenarios would not apply if a wiretap is ultimately classified as unlawful.