Does a supplemental order for a target specific intercept extend the time of the intercept?

A supplemental order for a target-specific intercept does not extend the time of the intercept. In the context of electronic surveillance under wiretap laws, once the original order is issued, it has a predetermined duration that is established based on the legal guidelines governing such intercepts.

A supplemental order might allow for additional monitoring of a specific target, but it does not inherently alter the timeframe of the original intercept. Each order is distinct and must be justified on its own merits, including providing evidence that further monitoring is necessary and legal within the scope of the existing laws.

The legal framework typically outlines strict timeliness for such orders to ensure that surveillance remains justified and is not prolonged unnecessarily without sufficient cause. Thus, the supplemental order serves a different purpose rather than extending the duration of the current intercept.